![WISDOM CRUX [ISSN 2456-6233]](https://www.wisdomcrux.lawtimesjournal.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/WISDOM-CRUX-ISSN-2456-6233.png)
(History of Law & Women)
[Volume 2, Issue 5] – May, 2017
Author – Ms. Varuni Yadav (B.A, M.A, M.Phil, LL.B, NET/JRF), Asst. Professor Amity Law School, Amity University, Noida.
ABSTRACT
The rights and laws for women are in disputes ever since and its evidences can be seen in history of India. This paper will demonstrate the journey of women’s since the era of Sati till present where the Equality in work, Education and Safety for women are the most priorities issues. This paper gives the idea of different phases of women’s rights prevailed in India.
Firstly it explains the religious personal laws concept and the reforms which occurs due to various social movements. Secondly it will illustrate various feminist legal responses to the issue of gender equality and the criticism emerged in that period regarding the contextualizing the demand for recognizing differences and examining whether feminists can argue without contradiction that different religious personal laws can be replaced with a uniform civil code (common family law). Third part portraits the modern era where women’s are engulfed with the lots of rights and which itself are not sufficient for their upliftment. The example of domestic violence legislation is used to argue that law can recognize the different social contexts of women in India and women in the global North, but must also pursue the goal of justice.
Last part will conclude with the suggestion and recommendation to update the present law to work more beneficially for the welfare of women on the basis of public opinion and other resources.
Introduction
Indian society has always seen a woman as a member of the family or a group and not as an individual or anyone who have rights of her own. India is a vast and complex society both territorial and demographically, with population of over 1 billion and in majority Indian woman cast as a victim of patriarchal and religious control. Western nations often describe India as an impenetrable place because of the images of instances of ‘sati’ and stories of mass foeticide. India is said to be the largest liberal democracy in the world still India is not easy to assess. Often cases where Indian woman cast as a victim of religious & patriarchal control have helped form in the western mind the stereotypical ignorant and backward Indian women.
This article will portray how the Indian women’s movement took place and what were the complex conditions which millions of revolutionist has to pass on for transforming India to this present nation which provide equality, security, inheritance and many more to Indian Women, still our nation have to go through a long journey to achieve the ideal stage. This article will show how India has rich beliefs in which women are considered equal to men and women are considered as Goddess & respected member in family and society as said in Ramayana & Mahabharat, after having such a rich history equal rights were not given to Indian women and are still struggling for their equal status in society.
For making a conclusion and evaluating the development in the position of women in society it is necessary to look at the history, as this history has a direct link to the women of today and then we will look at some of the fundamental changes that occurred through the nineteenth and twentieth century, in particular the nationalist and independence movement and other rules and policy which altered the women’s standing in society. Finally this article analyse whether the pace of development in women rights is effective enough or does India needs better implementation of existing laws or does it need new legislation.
History & Culture of Indian Society: In respect of women.
The principle of equality of women and men has been fundamental to customary Indian thinking and the Hindu religious reasoning. The story of Indian women is best conceptualized as far as India’s old history and mythology doing a reversal around 4000 years. In modern times, its enslavement as a state and recovery since 1945 as a free and majority rule common nation. Historically Indian women are equivalent to men. The idea of lady as Shakti, the primal vitality power, discovers expression in the celebrated epic MAHABARATHA. In this epic lady is celebrated as a “light of the house, mother of the universe and supporter of the earth and every one of its woodlands”. The Mahabharata further says that there is no master like the mother. In prior Vedic, age a lady held higher and regarded circumstance in sexual orientation relationship. Manu in his MANUSMRITI, who was the first to systematize the laws in India, additionally expound on this, “Where ladies are verily respected, there the divine beings cheer, where, be that as it may, they are not regarded, there every single sacrosanct ceremony demonstrate futile”. In another epic RAMAYANA, when Rama proposed to perform the Ashwamedha Yajana without Sita, the religious standards exhorted Rama to keep a brilliant status of his wife next to him amid the service. These legends through ages have gotten to be benchmark with which status of ladies is thought about. While making correlation it is constantly said that as ladies partake similarly alongside men in the religious ceremonies so lady are equivalent to men. The most essential issues that shaped the base of social changes amid the opportunity battle were the cancelation of sati, dowager remarriages, and restriction on tyke relational unions and ladies’ training. Along these lines, history lets us know that the flexibility battle that intertwined around the topic of sex balance, free India consolidated this standard in the constitution in 1950.
In order to evaluate the position of women in India today it is necessary to first look at some of the fundamental changes that occurred through the nineteenth and twentieth centuries ; in particular the nationalist and independence movement. These movements and the changes they brought about in India profoundly altered women’s standing in society.
It can be said that the evolution of the Indian women’s movement in the nineteenth century became out of a social and nationalistic reaction to the British colonialists denouncing of the treatment of women as brutal and straightforwardly joined with Indian religious practices. It was the colonialist’s dispute that the conventions of Indian religions represented the concealment of women, not their social or monetary condition. This drove patriots to take up the women reason and casing it in the more extensive setting of an assault on Indian convention when all is said in done. This they did by drawing the refinement in the middle of “ghar” and ‘bahir’, or the “home” and the “world” , the dichotomy used to isolate the inward otherworldly world and the external material world. Renowned socialist Mr. Chatterjee translates this dichotomy as a method for keeping up the positive components of western realism ; monetary practices, great administration, levelheadedness, science, and so forth, with the higher, otherworldly nature of Indian society; the distinguishing proof of qualities that are unmistakably national.
This dichotomy helps us to understand how women’s gender roles were redefined within the nationalist’s political project. Women became protectors of the spiritual domain, the home or ghar.
Education of women turned into a well known thought in in the mid nineteenth century . This was done in the setting of the patriot development as it was seen as attractive that women got to be taught in their own dialect, and alluring that they could accomplish a predominance over western women, women of the first era and over women of the lower classes. This gave the women of the higher classes and stations a feeling of opportunity and self-liberation. This, in any case, was a piece of the dichotomy that Chatterjee distinguished and indeed prompted another type of persecution.
This new type of persecution can be seen as detaining the women in a ‘non activist and non transformative’ state, whose prevalence over all others implied she now exemplified ghar and the ‘unaltered home life during a time of flux. This change of the women to this new hoisted position in Hindu society confined them to this recently characterized sex part. This part was to have critical influence in conservative governmental issues later on.
It was around the 1970’s that the contemporary women’s development started to be more radical and dynamic, particularly against the Indian state who for a period proclaimed a highly sensitive situation which prompted the constraint of all political and dynamic gatherings, not only women’s. This restraint prompted a battle back by women’s associations which incredibly expanded their degree and force. Today issues are battled about an expansive range of issues including ; union rights, harsh accomplices, the privileges of “dalit” women, laborer’s rights, rape and a great deal more. It is not simply left-wing and dynamic causes that are battled about by women, yet conservative issues as well.
Hindu patriotism, the sort of patriotism that prompted the new type of persecution that portrayed, still has an expansive say in women’s issues in India today. Sex imagery has been utilized by the present day Hindu patriot development in much the same as the patriots and hostile to colonialist’s of the nineteenth century did, with the urgent distinction, then again, that few female pioneers now embrace renunciation and savagery as a piece of their symbolism. Amrita Basu utilizes the case of three Hindu women in Sarkar and Butalia (1995) to highlight how sexuality and viciousness have been utilized inside of the women’s development. Vijayraje Scindia, Uma Bharati and Sadhvi Rithambara, individuals from Hindu patriot gatherings and pioneers inside of their related women’s associations, have all pronounced their chastity and are known as ‘sanyasins’. In India, as Mahatma Ghandi delineates, renunciation practices huge typical and notable symbolism. This picture of the sanyasin uplifts their capacity to connect and bring together assorted segments, distinctive standings and classes inside of Indian culture. Scindia, Bharati and Rithambara have possessed the capacity to do this with extraordinary accomplishment as they are seen as past good rebuke.
However this rise of the person through sexuality gives women the ability to enter political verbal confrontation with religious imagery, muddying the waters of the Indian states effectively temperamental common status. This augmentation of the dichotomy of ghar and bahir, and the engaging influence the ‘defensive internal sanctum of the home has on Hindu women empowers them to assault lawmakers, Muslims and the common state, regularly violently. The statement of female strength over Muslim men has prompted far reaching viciousness against them. Purposeful publicity from the privilege has developed the exaggeration of the Muslim man as assailant of Hindu women and in this way aggressor of all Hindu’s. The case this brutality is an illustration of the conservative Hindu development’s capacities to co-pick women’s issues for the sake of their own reasons.
Tanika Sarkar in Jeffrey and Basu (1998) relates this to intercommunity strife and struggle, a component of Indian life that the Hindu Right has looked to feed through the twentieth century and into the twenty-first. The Indian women, then, turned into an image of the entire Hindu group and ‘has developed as vital preparing drive, since a significant part of the savagery was made around claims out of kidnappings by Muslim culprits.
The Indian lady is not, be that as it may, characterized entirely by the right’s endeavors to suitable them. Numerous a huge number of women are occupied with an assortment of dissents against such sexual orientation qualifications as ghar and battle numerous different fights, little and expansive. Before we detail some of these fights we should first take a gander at how these fights emerge and why.
In India it appears that the sorts of dissent that happen are all that much subject to the area. Diverse parts of India appear to create changed sorts of challenge from women. Raka Ray distinguishes the substitute types of challenge that happen in Bombay and Calcutta, and cases this is because of the diverse “fields” in which women’s associations work. Beam draws on Bourdieu and Wacquant’s thoughts that associations are implanted to their field, acting not as self-ruling substances but rather as organs that are joined to the field in which they began and its social relations. This can be can be either an opposing or corresponding relationship in the middle of association and field and in this manner specifically compelling to our examination of women’s social developments.
For instance Ray claims that in Calcutta there seems to have been less associations set up by women concerning women’s issues than in Bombay. However this is just a shallow appearance as it is on account of the associations in Calcutta work around issues that are not particularly women’s activist or sexual orientation related and subsequently gets less universal acknowledgment. The issues that women in Calcutta concentrate on are not said to be particularly women’s issues ; discretionary change, water issues, power issues, and so on. These worries influence women however are not sex focussed. In Bombay however women are included in sexual orientation related issues significantly more. These issues concern brutality towards women, inappropriate behavior, contraception, and so on, and are all said to be women’s activist issues that are expressly a worry of women.
The distinctions in issues in the two urban communities can be clarified by Ray’s idea of contrasting fields. What this refinement additionally does is blueprint that women in India are included with significantly more than the customary, women’s activist, sexual orientation related issues. This extending of the range in which women work opens up to us how women in India today are enabling themselves in all parts of society. Beam plots two distinct fields in which women work ; the “political” field and the “dissent” field.
The “political” field is said to be involved by the state and standard gatherings, and are frequently working inside of the effectively settled request. “Challenge” fields work inside of the political fields yet are frequently in direct resistance with people with great influence or those battling for force inside of the political field. These fields both have authentic and social roots in the district they are arranged in and thusly so do the developments that emerge from these fields. So the issues that are seen as essential in Calcutta are vital in light of the fact that they are specifically compelling to women in Calcutta. Beam makes the point that Chafetz and Dworkin partner these distinctions with demographic contrasts, for example, family size, age at marriage, and so on. These can be said to straightforwardly decide the kind of dissent that a women’s association may take up on the grounds that it can, in addition to other things, impact the measure of leisure time women have, their financial position and their should be a piece of the work workforce.
So we see that in India the women’s development can contrast subject to the field in which they are found. Additionally we can say that we must not confine what issues we expect to some portion of the women’s development and that customary sexual orientation characterized issues ought not corner the entire women’s development. Albeit women’s activist edification has helped the women’s development, we ought to be careful about depicting it as simply a women’s activist development.
Dissent by women in India against severe conditions comes in numerous structures. Today the women’s development ‘exists in an exceptionally decentralized structure with many associations in both urban and provincial zones all through the nation. This depiction assists our case the wide expansiveness that development includes. How would we characterize what is a piece of the Indian women’s development. As Patricia focuses out, female imperviousness to mistreatment can be found in numerous spots and in numerous structures ; the over the top salting of dinners, the singing of tunes to recall shameful acts and solace others, scorn of spouses to loved ones in the face of his good faith, and so on. These challenges may appear to be paltry yet they demonstrate the Indian women to be a long way from the consistent, uninformed individual that she is frequently painted as in the west.
Desai demonstrates to us that the Indian women’s development has turned out to be more emotional by recognizing national and neighborhood level association. Through self-governing, adaptable and casual structures and aggregate sorts of associations the Indian women’s development has possessed the capacity to accomplish in both political and social circles : National association and aggregate work with different gatherings to accomplish political objectives and neighborhood triumphs through starting aggregate obligation in social matters. Desai focuses out that the adaptability of women’s gatherings has empowered more triumphs and is being duplicated universally. This scatters the idea that picks up can just come broadly through bureaucratic structures, the Indian women’s development has demonstrated that through participation and agreement building extraordinary triumphs can be achieved
Evolution of Gender Issue
Gender has been a central ‘issue’ in India since the colonial encounter. An overwhelming preoccupation with the “woman’s question” arose from the 19th century social reform movement, crucially informed anti-colonial nationalism, and remains a point of crisis in India’s cultural, social, and political space. The recognition of gender as an issue forms the basis for India’s women’s movement.
One prominent gender concern was status— that is, the rewards and benefits that accrued to women on India’s journey to self-determination, statehood, democracy, progress, modernity, and development. In 1974 the Indian government published a report, Towards Equality, that put status of women forcefully on the national agenda by arguing that the position of Indian women had declined, not improved, since 1911 (Committee on the Status of Women 1974). As a result development and progress became gender issues. Data on gender discrimination in employment, education, land distribution, inheritance, nutrition, and health became impossible to overlook.
At the same time violence against women was on the rise and widely reported in the media. There were cases of rape in police custody, wife murder (usually called bride-burning or dowry deaths) on a large scale, and sexual harassment in the workplace and on the street. Women’s issues entered the fields of culture, religion, and law; of family and community structures; of the problems of and official responses to population, poverty, illiteracy, and labor; and of the new social movements of dalits, environmentalists, tribals, anti-dam activists, peasants, and trade unions. Rajeswari Sunder Rajan, taking stock of the 50th independence celebrations, comments that in “all these discourses, disciplines and sites of action, gender began to figure as an ‘issue’ as well as a category of analysis”.
Indian Laws
India practices common law framework obtained from the frontier rulers that are in the meantime altogether different from the first British common law. Amid colonization, original thoughts of utilitarianism and lawful positivism offered life to numerous English advancements in India.
The sound relationship between a legitimate framework and its general public was savagely disturbed doubly by this test. Indians came to have a lawful framework created in light of the needs of an altogether different society, that of England yet while laws in England have surrendered or altered the greater part of these lawful ideas, India keeps up the “custom” of the pilgrim laws. The idea of religious individual laws is one of those thoughts.
Verifiably, in Europe, the law made a qualification between individual laws and the lawful codes of the domain all in all. In India before colonization, be that as it may, Hindus and Muslims with not very many special cases were represented by their own particular individual laws. Colonization in India happened in a complex and topographically shifted way. Diverse parts of the nation went under pioneer control under distinctive legitimate plans. English laws were presented step by step and specifically and “individual matters” were to remain administered by the religious laws of these groups.
Be that as it may, the substance of individual laws was resolved haphazardly in the progressive contracts and regulations. In addition, the substantive substance of these standards was changed in legal and authoritative activities. The legal part in such manner was huge regardless of the fact that accidental. Bit by bit administrative changes were additionally presented, yet in spite of these progressions the thought has continued that the RPLs are permanent.
The act of applying laws of religious groups in individual matters was viewed as the “sparing” of religious laws, to a limited extent as a result of the dialect utilized. Distinctive groups in India were distinguished by the religions they took after and the individual laws that the English heads had chosen to spare were additionally thusly comprehended as religious, in spite of the fact that practically speaking they could be group traditions instead of scriptural principles. Consequently religious laws and individual laws got to be compatible, and in the process it was overlooked that before the entry of the British heads, all parts of the laws.
The state has specifically utilized the contention of religious holiness of these laws yet at different times presented authoritative changes. The majority of the progressions have been presented in the Hindu Laws however the adjustments in the minority groups’ laws have been additionally ending. Apparently the minority status of a few groups has been given need over sexual orientation equity, however Hindu women have additionally not figured out how to increase complete equality of rights with men. The latest change, in 2005, of the Hindu Succession Act was proposed so as to make little girls approach coparceners; in any case, the enactment by and by still leaves women with lesser rights than men((Centre For Social Research, http://www.csrindia.org/national-laws-acts)).
It is in these specific circumstances that sexual orientation fairness for Indian women will probably be accomplished by presenting an administration of common family law that would plan governs in order to perceive the guideline of sex correspondence as the characterizing highlight of the law.
Uniform Law as the Guarantor of Fairness and Justice Liberalism and positivism have joined to define a perspective of current law as self-governing of the economy and society, as opposed to prior originations of law that depended on authentic or religious clarifications.
In this broadly acknowledged perspective, the real power of law is subordinate upon widespread, unbiased, and conceptual standards. The law characterizes who is a legitimate subject and everybody who meets these necessities is qualified for the same rights independent of their religion, riches, sex, or whatever other trademark((Women’s Struggles & Women’s Movement in India, http://www.europe solidaire .org/spip.php? article 27410 [last updated Nov. 20,2015])).
Liberal legalism specifically discovers its authenticity in this surety of non-assertion, of decency to everybody independent of their particular attributes or contrasts.
Legal feminists have widely evaluated claims about the nonpartisanship and all inclusiveness of law. Customarily feminist engagements with law are isolated into three expansive stages. The earliest feminists, liberal feminists, contended for equivalent legitimate rights based upon the crucial equivalence of women and men.
On the other hand, even after women increased formal equity it was evident that men and women stayed in a sexual orientation based various leveled relationship((Hanumant Deshmukh, Indian constitution provide for women, http://hanumant.com/WomenAndLaw.html [last updated Nov. 23,2015])).
Feminists now clarified that impartiality of law in actuality kept up male benefit while depicting legitimate guidelines as sexually impartial.
This thusly offered ascend to the sameness–difference banter in the feminist talk: Whether law ought to be sexually unbiased or sex particular. Feminists who requested that the distinctive needs and hobbies of women recognized in law needed to go up against the charge that any deviation from unbiased guidelines adds up to exceptional or particular treatment.
The accentuation on distinction has turned out to be more unpredictable with the coming of post auxiliary scrutinizes about the essentialism of pioneer thought. Post-basic hypothesis has tested the thought of all inclusive tenets in light of the fact that any conclusion of definitions is exclusionary and along these lines out of line. The class of lady is in this manner deconstructed to make clear the distinctions among women (e.g., race, ethnicity, sexuality, and so on.). In the event that lady is not a bound together classification, the suggestion is that not all women have comparative hobbies, and in this manner feminist legislative issues of change and particularly of lawful change gets to be risky. This advancement, known as the counter essentialism thought in post-basic hypothesis, has an outcome that social pluralism regularly comes at the expense of sexual orientation correspondence.
The test now is to re-conceptualize classes of law in a way that women’s advantage are neither released nor minimized. Post-structuralism does not mean either that all women must be dealt with the same or that no broad principles can be planned((Women’s Movements, http://www.encyclopedia.com/topic/womens_movement.aspx [last updated Nov. 22,2015])).
Maybe it requests that consideration is paid to the outcomes of perceiving contrasts. In this way, feminist examinations of law must always conjecture the mind boggling connections in the middle of women and law by conceptualizing law as a site of battle, implying that law is not a pre-given or last. It is dependably a result of contestation and women like some other group need to always contend for sexual orientation just laws.
In addition, what constitutes sexual orientation equity must be an unexpected definition under consistent examination, constantly accessible for rethinking—which takes into account a wide range of voices to illuminate the substance of law. This can be outlined with a brief examination of the enactment of domestic violence act((Hanumant Deshmukh, Indian constitution provide for women,http://hanumant.com/WomenAndLaw.html [last updated Nov. 25,2015])).
The Domestic Violence Act 2005
The enactment of the 2005 Domestic Violence [Prevention] Act (DVA) in the Indian Parliament raises various significant issues for feminists trying to comprehend law as a site of battle. It is additionally an illustration of how the “wrong” of domestic violence needs altogether different solutions for women of Northern and Southern countries. The contrasts between the states of women in distinctive social orders should be perceived however dependably with the stipulation that such acknowledgment prompts an equitable or reasonable result. Women’s bunches’ interest for a law on domestic violence was repeated by the National Commission for Women and later received by the administration. It is sensible to ask what provoked the women’s gatherings to verbalize this interest for a lawful reaction to violence against women and would could it be that the benefactors of the act wanted to accomplish.
Domestic violence emerges in a particular financial connection for most Indian women. The absence of genuine monetary autonomy of most Indian women supports the social development of women as wards. The supposed religious individual laws deny women even formal legitimate uniformity in individual relations. In this connection it is no surprise that domestic violence is a genuine issue. The endeavors of women’s gatherings to name this issue and to look for legitimate change for it are justifiable yet are educated by certain dangerous thoughts regarding the law((Women Protection and Changing Laws, http://www.legalservicesindia.com/article/article/women-protection-and-changing-laws-1818-1.html [last updated Nov. 25,2015])).
The DVA is a case of the push to name certain social substances as a sexual orientation particular damage endured by women in India. Naming domestic violence as a subject of common law is a critical re-conceptualization. The proposed solution for domestic violence in any case, is not exactly promising. The DVA has characterized the significant issue as the “privilege” of the lady complainant to stay in the wedding home. In this manner when a lady, subject to violence, makes a lawful grumbling, the courts are enabled to permit her (to the prohibition of the rough spouse) to possess the home. Without this law her just choice would be to leave the house. Probably, this law gives her an opportunity to make courses of action for escaping a vicious marriage, however this is the place the more extensive social, financial, and social conditions hinder her way out. The high social premium on a lady’s place in the spouse’s home is a social reality for most women. The monetary supporting of this social standard is the fact that most women are monetarily indigent. Besides, they can’t reasonably expect either support or an offer of property on separation. The privilege of living arrangement in the wedding home (legitimately the spouse’s home) in this manner, is a void accomplishment. The lady can’t live there uncertainly and nothing else in her circumstances has changed to empower her to be fiscally autonomous. Regardless of the possibility that this law is a restricted development, why are Indian feminists so humble in their requests? Most likely they are recognizing the specific social substances of Indian women, yet a more coordinated reaction is required.
The domestic violence law is as quite constrained by the more extensive social, financial, and political connections as our inability to challenge the imbalances incorporated with the religious individual laws.((Women Protection and Changing Laws, http://www.legalservicesindia.com/article/article/women-protection-and-changing-laws-1818-1.html [last updated Nov. 20,2015])) A lady who looks for the assurance of the DVA will perpetually be financially reliant, and that reliance in itself is to a huge degree supported by different laws. For instance, the absence of rights in marital property, deceptive support rights, insufficient rights in rural area, and nonattendance of vocation opportunities keep up the imbalances. How then can the DVA change anything?
Still, it is obvious that for every one of its constraints, the law is a stage forward in working towards sexual orientation equity. It obviously does not imply that the battles for every other sort of fairness rights are no more fundamental((Hanumant Deshmukh, Indian constitution provide for women, http://hanumant.com/WomenAndLaw.html ; last updated Nov. 20,2015)).
Legal feminist talk in India at present does not bargain enough with these key issues. A conceivable clarification of this situation is that, as a particular legacy of the historical backdrop of colonization, lawful grant in India is for the most part gotten in a period twist. With regards to the moderate perspective of lawful learning as specialized skill, most lawful examinations in India confine themselves to doctrinal accentuations. Lawful grant that limits itself to looking at the details of the principle can’t connect with the interdisciplinary advancements in lawful hypothesis somewhere else.
Conclusion
The present condition of Indian women is not good enough as compared to other developed and developing countries especially to western countries. On one hand we are talking about Indian being the next superpower in the world and want India to stand and be part of the finest nations in the world and asking for permanent membership in Security Council in United Nation Organisation. But on other hand Indian society does not want to change its patriarchal mentality of giving equal status to women. We can say India is in a race of super power on the basis of technology and economically development but when it comes on the basis of gender equality India is far behind.
No doubt the strata of women in India is improved since the time of independence but now also the Indian women is deprived and for that we do not need to look at any annual survey or reports all we just need to turn over the pages of daily newspaper and by their perusal we find numerous cases from which it can be concluded that women in India is not getting the respect which they deserve in their family, nor a health work environment is provided to them, women in India are not safe on road neither in home neither in day or night.
We are not denying the fact that our nation does not providing rights for maintaining dignity and their overall development even after the existence of these legislations the deserved equality to the women in society is not achieved which means there are some lacunas which needs to be addressed first to fulfill the core objective of the existing legislation. The lacuna is we have numerous legislations for the development of women right but those laws are not yet properly implemented. India needs to make strategy for implementation of those women centric laws and after that should analyse whether those laws are sufficient enough and if not then new laws and policies should be made.
Bibliography
— Bush, D. (1992) ‘Women’s Movements and State Policy Reform Aimed at Domestic Violence against Women : A Comparison of the Consequences of Movement Mobilization in the U.S. and India’ Gender and Society Vol. 6, No. 4 (Dec., 1992), pp. 587-608
— Desai, M. (1996) ‘Informal Organizations as Agents of Change : Notes From The Contemporary Women’s Movement in India’ Mobilization : An International Quarterly Volume 1, Number 2 / September 1996
— Jeffrey, P. and A. Basu ‘eds’ (1998) Appropriating Gender, Great Britain : Routledge
— Patel, I (1998) ‘The Contemporary Women’s Movement and Women’s Education in India’, International Review of Education Vol. 44, No. 2/3
— Ray, R. (1999) Fields of Protest, Minneapolis : University of Minnesota Press
— Ray, R (1998) ‘Women’s Movements and Political Fields : A Comparison of Two Indian Cities’ Social Problems Vol. 45, No. 1 (Feb., 1998), pp. 21-36
— Sarkar & Butalia ‘eds’ (1995) Women & Right-Wing Movements, London : Zed Books Ltd
— According to the study, “India’s Economy: The Other Half”, which was published in 2012 by the Center for Strategic and International Studies, the author Persis Khambatta states that India, with a total of 478 million employees, has the second largest workforce in the world. The proportion of women is only 24% and the proportion of women in top positions is even 5%, compared to a global average of 20%. Almost half of the women discontinue their careers before they reach the middle of it. This happens mostly because even well-educated Indian women have to conform to the social constraints of their traditional role. Ref. Kolhatkar, Sheelah (2013): India`s Economy Lacks as the Women Lack Opportunity. URL: http://mobile.businessweek.com/articles/2013-01-31/indias-economy-lags-as-its-womenlack-opportunity[12.11.2015].
— Arena, Biz (2014): MicroFinance – Current Status and Growing Concerns in India. URL: http://www.iitk.ac.in/ime/MBA_IITK/avantgarde/?p=475 [12.11.2015].